KRFL - a football simulation league
Forums
KRFL :: Forums :: KRFL Forums :: 2020 League Business
Amendment Proposal: Team Rescue Plan << Previous thread | Next thread >>
Go to page       >>  
Moderators: noodles, MarkB
Author Post
Steelers
Sat Mar 21 2020, 01:08p.m.
Registered Member #100
Joined: Sat Jan 25 2020, 07:43p.m.

Posts: 51
Team Rescue Plan Proposal

( Proposal in event comprehensive package is not approved )

5.2 DELETED
5.2 Team Rescue Plan

-any team which finishes in the bottom 4 of the league ( based on winning percentage ) for 2 consecutive seasons may eliminate any two veteran contacts without penalty and get a supplemental first round draft pick ( pick 25 ) in year 3. A team may not use the same season to count for more than one rescue plan. i.e... if you use seasons 2020 and 2021 to qualify, then you can not use 2021 and 2022 to qualify.

This proposal would take effect immediately upon passing so teams could use seasons 2019 and 2020 in order to qualify for the team rescue plan.


Reason for Proposal

This proposal creates a safety net for failed franchises , a bankruptcy provision which allows teams to rebuild.




[ Edited Tue Mar 24 2020, 07:29a.m. ]
Back to top
KRFL-BayCity
Sat Mar 21 2020, 04:28p.m.
Registered Member #12
Joined: Mon Sep 01 2008, 07:40p.m.

Posts: 706
when are you proposing this go into effect? 2020, based on 2018 + 2019 records; or 2022,, based on 2020 + 2021 records
Back to top
Steelers
Sat Mar 21 2020, 04:45p.m.
Registered Member #100
Joined: Sat Jan 25 2020, 07:43p.m.

Posts: 51
2022,, based on 2020 + 2021 records
Back to top
KRFL-BayCity
Sun Mar 22 2020, 11:50a.m.
Registered Member #12
Joined: Mon Sep 01 2008, 07:40p.m.

Posts: 706
Why not implement it immediately for the upcoming season?
Back to top
Steelers
Sun Mar 22 2020, 12:53p.m.
Registered Member #100
Joined: Sat Jan 25 2020, 07:43p.m.

Posts: 51
whatever gets the most votes :)
Back to top
MarkB
Sun Mar 22 2020, 05:24p.m.
Mark Blume

Registered Member #81
Joined: Mon Oct 14 2013, 08:54a.m.

Posts: 1110
Steelers wrote ...

whatever gets the most votes :)


We will not have nor vote on multiple derivations of the same proposal. Unless Jim posts something different, I'll assume it goes into effect in "2022,, based on 2020 + 2021 records" as Jim posted above.
Back to top
jonwolgamuth
Mon Mar 23 2020, 09:12p.m.
Registered Member #92
Joined: Sun Jan 28 2018, 01:51p.m.

Posts: 23
MarkB wrote ...

Steelers wrote ...

whatever gets the most votes :)


We will not have nor vote on multiple derivations of the same proposal. Unless Jim posts something different, I'll assume it goes into effect in "2022,, based on 2020 + 2021 records" as Jim posted above.


I think this should be voted on and implemented immediately if it passes rather than waiting to see how the next two years play out. I'm assuming Jim could "amend" his proposal prior to voting, correct?
Back to top
Steelers
Tue Mar 24 2020, 07:31a.m.
Registered Member #100
Joined: Sat Jan 25 2020, 07:43p.m.

Posts: 51
I just amended the proposal so it would take effect immediately.
The purpose of this comment period is to discuss the merits of the proposal and make any changes necessary to meet any rational objections.
Back to top
mark
Tue Mar 24 2020, 07:57a.m.
Registered Member #45
Joined: Wed May 05 2010, 11:29p.m.

Posts: 628
This is the only part of the package(plan) I’m in favor of.
Back to top
Salem
Tue Mar 24 2020, 04:17p.m.
Registered Member #25
Joined: Sun Sep 07 2008, 10:07p.m.

Posts: 586
To me, this promotes tanking. An extra 1st round pick?? I would definitely vote no on this one.
Back to top
Go to page       >>   

Jump:     Back to top

Syndicate this thread: rss 0.92 Syndicate this thread: rss 2.0 Syndicate this thread: RDF
Powered by e107 Forum System